R. v. STETTNER, 2024 SKCA 88, SEPTEMBER 11, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of a number of assault related offences against his former partner (AR). During the trial, evidence
R. v. Maric, 2024 ONCA 665, September 10, 2024, at paragraphs 153 and 154: [I]t is important to note that a subfacial challenge to a warrant has to do with
R. v. C.R.J., 2024 BCCA 308, August 29, 2024, at paragraphs 64 to 69: It is now well-accepted that by itself, the fact of non-disclosure or delayed disclosure cannot support
R. v. REIMER, 2024 ONCA 519, AUGUST 26, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offence of sexual assault. At his trial, the complainant described acts of forced sexual
R. v. KHANDAKAR, 2024 ONCA 620, AUGUIST 20, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offence of failing to comply with an ASDS demand, contrary to section of the
R. v. GAUTHIER, 2024 ONCA 621. AUGUST 20, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the first degree murder of his partner. At the trial, the Crown presented a voice
R. v. HOGGARD, 2024 ONCA 613, AUGUST 16, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offences of sexual assault. At the trial, the Crown presented expert evidence about “the neuroscience
R. v. ATTARD, 2024 ONCA 616, AUGUST 16, 2024. FACTS: The accused was charged with dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing bodily harm, contrary to section 249(3) of the Criminal
BQ v. THE KING [2024] HCA 29, AUGUST 14, 2024. FACTS: The accused was charged with child sexual offences in relation to two of his nieces. At his trial, the
Copyright © 2021 – CAPCJ/ACJCP