R. v. Toth, 2024 BCCA 139, April 15, 2024, at paragraphs 27 to 29: The first element of self defence under s. 34(1)(a) asks whether Mr. Toth believed, on reasonable grounds, that force
Chemama c. R., 2024 QCCA 405: [120] …the Court agrees with the appeal amicus that alternatives to a complete removal must always be considered. The words of Proulx J.A, for the Court, are
R. v. E.S., 2024 NLCA 12, APRIL 1, 2024. FACTS: The accused was charged with two sexual offences. The offences alleged that the accused had sexually assaulted a child (JP)
R. v. DEVOS, 2024 MBCA 23, OCTOBER 18, 2023. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offences of impaired driving and dangerous driving causing death. The circumstances were described by
R. v. Devos, 2024 MBCA 23, October 18, 2023, at paragraphs 47 to 49 and 52: In convicting the accused, the trial judge relied on indicia of poor judgment
R. v. Hadvick, 2024 YKCA 2, March 6, 2024, at paragraphs 69 and 70: The statement regarding the second category—evidence unknown to the accused—is more difficult to assess, especially as
R. v. G.J.M., 2024 BCCA 82, MARCH 7, 2024. FACTS: The accused pleaded guilty to three counts of sexual interference and one count of possession of child pornography. The circumstances
R. v. CPR, 2024 MBCA 22, February 27, 2024, at paragraphs 23 and 24: The purpose of s 161 prohibition orders is to protect children from sexual violence. Such orders
R. v. ZATREPALEK, 2024 SKCA 27, MARCH 8, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offences of possession of child pornography, distribution of child pornography and accessing child pornography,
Copyright © 2021 – CAPCJ/ACJCP