R. v. J.F.V.D., 2025 BCCA 4, at paragraphs 77, 79, 81 and 82: In my view, this case review demonstrates well that there must be something unique or “rare” in
R. v. REVES, 2025 ABCA 5, JANUARY 9, 2025. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offence of sexual interference. At his trial, the trial judge ruled that the Crown
WD, R. v [2025] NICA 1, January 7, 2025, at paragraphs 31 to 33: In most burglary and theft cases the objective of the perpetrator is to take the property
R. v. AVILA, 2025 BCCA 5, JANUARY 9, 2025. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offence of sexual assault. He appealed from conviction, arguing that the trial judge erred
R. v. BEVAN, 2024 BCCA 414, DECEMBER 19, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offence of sexual interference. He was sentenced to a period of incarceration. In addition,
Introduction: The purpose of this paper is to review those decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada in the time-period of January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024, that
R. v. Umpherville, 2024 SKCA 117, December 20, 2024, at paragraphs 49 and 65: The requirement under s. 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code relates to the fundamental principle of proportionality,
R. v. Case, 2024 ONCA 900, December 13, 2024, at paragraphs 11 to 13: The appellants argue that the complainant’s memory of the alleged assault was a dream that she
R. v. CAMPBELL, 2024 SCC 42, DECEMBER, 6, 2024. FACTS: The police arrested Mr. Kyle Gammie and seized his cellular telephone. They then responded to incoming text messages and subsequently
Copyright © 2021 – CAPCJ/ACJCP