SENTENCING-TRANSFERRING A FIREARM-SECTION 99 CRIMINAL CODE
R. v. Chief, 2024 MBCA 67, September 19, 2024, at paragraphs 18, 19, 23, 29, 36 to 44, and 45-46: Firearm offences under s 99 attract a relatively broad range
R. v. Chief, 2024 MBCA 67, September 19, 2024, at paragraphs 18, 19, 23, 29, 36 to 44, and 45-46: Firearm offences under s 99 attract a relatively broad range
R. v. R.A., 2024 ONCA 696, SEPTEMBER 19, 2024. FACTS: The accused was charged with the offence of sexual assault. It was alleged that he sexually assaulted his eleven year-old
R. v. STETTNER, 2024 SKCA 88, SEPTEMBER 11, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of a number of assault related offences against his former partner (AR). During the trial, evidence
R. v. Maric, 2024 ONCA 665, September 10, 2024, at paragraphs 153 and 154: [I]t is important to note that a subfacial challenge to a warrant has to do with
R. v. C.R.J., 2024 BCCA 308, August 29, 2024, at paragraphs 64 to 69: It is now well-accepted that by itself, the fact of non-disclosure or delayed disclosure cannot support
R. v. REIMER, 2024 ONCA 519, AUGUST 26, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offence of sexual assault. At his trial, the complainant described acts of forced sexual
R. v. KHANDAKAR, 2024 ONCA 620, AUGUIST 20, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offence of failing to comply with an ASDS demand, contrary to section of the
R. v. GAUTHIER, 2024 ONCA 621. AUGUST 20, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the first degree murder of his partner. At the trial, the Crown presented a voice
R. v. HOGGARD, 2024 ONCA 613, AUGUST 16, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offences of sexual assault. At the trial, the Crown presented expert evidence about “the neuroscience
Copyright © 2021 – CAPCJ/ACJCP