EVIDENCE-RES GESTAE
References by His Majesty’s Advocate against PG and JM, [2024] HCJAC 43, October 30, 2024, at paragraph 19: The following have been accepted as falling within the res gestae: (i)
References by His Majesty’s Advocate against PG and JM, [2024] HCJAC 43, October 30, 2024, at paragraph 19: The following have been accepted as falling within the res gestae: (i)
AEB & ORS, R. v [2024] EWCA CRIM 1320, NOVEMBER 1, 2024. FACTS: The accused were charged with money laundering charges involving Apple gift cards. During the investigation, the police
R. v. ARCHAMBAULT, 2024 SCC 35, NOVEMBER 1, 2024. FACTS: The accused were charged with various sexual offences alleged to have been committed between 1958 and 1960 (Mr. Archambault) and
R. v. B.B., 2024 ONCA 788, at paragraphs 15 to 18: Prior consistent statements are presumptively inadmissible… There are exceptions to the rule against prior consistent statements being received into
R. v. CHARLES, 2024 SCC 29, SEPTEMBER 25, 2024. FACTS: The accused was charged with a number of offences, including assault with a weapon. At his trial, the Crown called KA as
R. v. WOLFE, 2024 SCC 34, OCTOBER 18, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of the offences of criminal negligence causing death and bodily harm. She was sentenced to a
R. v. Chief, 2024 MBCA 67, September 19, 2024, at paragraphs 18, 19, 23, 29, 36 to 44, and 45-46: Firearm offences under s 99 attract a relatively broad range
R. v. R.A., 2024 ONCA 696, SEPTEMBER 19, 2024. FACTS: The accused was charged with the offence of sexual assault. It was alleged that he sexually assaulted his eleven year-old
R. v. STETTNER, 2024 SKCA 88, SEPTEMBER 11, 2024. FACTS: The accused was convicted of a number of assault related offences against his former partner (AR). During the trial, evidence
Copyright © 2021 – CAPCJ/ACJCP